Climate Risk Management has been promoted as one of the core features of agricultural adaption by the Adaption for African Agriculture (AAA) initiative. In the United Nations climate conference in Marrakesh (COP2016), this approach has also been discussed in the context of the climate finance agenda.
When we think about the implementation of such adaption programs, the
question arises whether it would be most effectively adopted on a local,
regional or national level.
In this regard, one should ask the vital question –
How can the small farmer in rural Ethiopia best increase resilience to climate change?
First it is important to realise that small-scale weather disasters have
severe long-term impacts on local people, but that these ‘minor’ disasters
usually do not attract any financial aid as compared to much bigger,
internationally reported catastrophes (e.g. tsunami). International disaster
aid does not reach small farmers and their communities in the risk management
of such droughts and flooding because of lacking attention, however these small
scale disasters can threaten farmers' existence, and do almost certainly erode
coping capacity over a long time period (Barns et al. 2011, 233). In 1984,
rural Ethiopia experienced a famine that resulted of a series of small droughts
that eroded coping capacity among communities (Fraser 2007).
It is this lack in risk management, where private insurers can step in
and enable an adaption strategy for climate change hazards.
Recognizing the unpredictability of climate change (even though climate
scientists have developed climate models that predict future scenarios, they
are not certain) and the unreliability of regionalised climate models, it
becomes clear that any future projections of climate hazards are not ideal on
the community level.
Due to these high levels of uncertainty, the small farmer in rural
Ethiopia should not rely on over generalised predictions (Brans et al. 2011,
217).
What is needed is a more ‘robust’ adaption strategy, meaning a
strategy that flexible against various future scenarios.
Brans et al. (2011) have proposed a community-based risk
management of climate hazards (e.g. drought) with the implementation of a
micro-insurance programme.
The underlying assumptions of this model are that much more financial
resources are necessary for successful climate change adaption and that private
sector involvement could play a vital role in that (Brans et al. 2011, 219).
This micro finance model enables the farmer to buy an insurance policy,
and if predefined weather events occur in a predefined time, then an insurance
payment goes to the farmer Such insurance packages can play a live saving role!
The HARITA Project (Horn of Africa Risk Transfer for Adaption) is an
initiative developed by multiple stakeholders that promotes the adaption tool
of ‘weather index insurance’ to reduce risk for the most vulnerable (Brans
et al. 2011, 218). The HARITA concept takes a holistic approach and consist of
3 main elements: risk reduction, risk transfer and prudent risk taking. This
graph visualizes the conceptual framework:
A HARITA pilot project has been implemented in 2009 in Adi Ha village in
Northern Ethiopia to test this kind of micro insurance and risk management
programme. The majority of the farmers in this village depend on rain-fed
agriculture, which makes them particularly vulnerable to climatic hazards such
as drought (Brans et al. 2011, 219). Prior to the
implementation of this pilot project, these farmers had been involved in
various assessments to design this adaption experiment. This community
participation produced a number of valuable inputs that enabled a very positive
uptake of the insurance product (Brans et al. 2011, 231). The HARITA
team aims to expand this model on several other villages in Ethiopia.
In the recent past, the adaption strategy of climate risk management has built up momentum. The ‘Initiative on Climate Risk Insurance’ (adopted by G7 in 2015 with financial plan of 42 million USD) supports a variety of schemes, such as the African Risk Capacity (ARC), the Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility (CCRIF) or the Climate Insurance Fund (CIF) that aim to reduce vulnerability by reducing risk (AAA).
Resources:
AAA, (2016). THE INITIATIVE FOR THE ADAPTATION OF
AFRICAN AGRICULTURE TO CLIMATE CHANGE.[online] Available at: http://www.aaainitiative.org/sites/aaainitiative.org/files/AAA_livre%20blanc_ENG.pdf
Brans, Marjorie Victor; Tadesse, Million; Takama, Takeshi (2016): „Community-Based solutions to the climate crisis in Ethiopia“. In: Fujikura, RyoKawanashi, Masato (Hrsg.) Climate Change Adaption and International Development. 1. Aufl. London, Washington DC: JICA Research Institute, S. 217 - 239.
Fraser, Evan D. G. (2007): „Travelling in antique lands: using past famines to develop an adaptability/resilience framework to identify food systems vulnerable to climate change“. In: Climatic Change. 83 (4), S. 495-514, DOI: 10.1007/s10584-007-9240-9.
No comments:
Post a Comment